Why the Best Businesses Systemise Selectively

Written with assistance from ChatGPT

How to free up capacity without stripping out what customers actually value

Many business owners resist systemising their business — and for good reason.

They worry about losing flexibility, damaging relationships, or turning something human into something mechanical. Those concerns are valid — if you systemise the wrong things.

The goal isn’t to systemise everything.
It’s to systemise the work that customers don’t value, so you can spend more time on the work they do.

Systemise the Routine, Not the Relationship

Customers rarely pay for:

  • internal administration

  • rework and corrections

  • duplicated effort

  • manual hand-offs

  • inconsistent execution

Yet this is where a disproportionate amount of time is lost.

The highest return from systemisation comes from work that is:

  • routine

  • repeatable

  • predictable

When these activities are handled consistently and efficiently, capacity is released — without touching the parts of the business where judgement, empathy, and experience matter most.

Capacity Is the Real Constraint

Most growing businesses don’t have a demand problem.
They have a capacity problem.

Growth stalls because:

  • teams are stretched

  • quality becomes harder to maintain

  • decisions bottleneck at the top

Systemisation is not about control.
It’s about creating headroom.

But systems alone are only one lever.

The Four Ways to Build Capacity in a Business

There are four practical ways to increase capacity.
System and process improvement is one of them — but it works best in combination with the others.

1. Headcount: Proactive, Not Reactive

Many businesses grow headcount in arrears:

  • hiring only once, people are already overloaded

  • reacting to pressure rather than planning for opportunity

This often leads to:

  • frustration

  • rushed recruitment

  • uneven performance

More deliberate businesses invest ahead of demand, creating capacity before it becomes urgent.

While this requires greater upfront investment, it:

  • stabilises delivery

  • improves morale

  • future-proofs growth

The question isn’t “can we afford to hire?”
It’s “what does operating under-capacity actually cost us?”

2. Technology: A Scalable Substitute for Labour

Technology — particularly with recent advances in automation and AI — has changed the capacity equation.

Used well, technology can:

  • remove manual steps

  • operate 24/7

  • reduce reliance on key individuals

  • scale without proportional increases in cost

There’s also a simple financial reality.

If a role costs £50,000 per year, over ten years, that’s £500,000.
A significant amount of technology — systems, automation, and AI — can be implemented for that level of investment.

The real question isn’t people versus technology.
It’s where technology is a better long-term substitute for routine work, freeing people to focus on work that genuinely adds value.

3. Capability: Delegation Requires Confidence

Many owners say they want to delegate — but struggle to do so safely.

That’s often not a systems problem.
It’s a capability problem.

Building capability through learning and development:

  • increases confidence

  • reduces rework

  • allows responsibility to move down the organisation

As capability grows, so does capacity — particularly at the leadership level.

Owners regain time not by doing less, but by trusting more.

4. Systems and Process Improvement: Focus on the Vital Few

Not all processes are equal.

A useful lens is the 80/20 principle:

  • Which 20% of systems and processes create 80% of the value your customers experience?

Those deserve attention — but not necessarily automation.

Each year, strong businesses review their key processes and ask:

  • Where is friction unnecessary?

  • Where are we repeating work?

  • Where is judgement essential — and where is it not?

Streamlining the right processes creates capacity without compromising customer value.

Systemisation Is a Leadership Decision

The mistake many businesses make is treating systems as an operational issue.

In reality, systemisation is a strategic choice:

  • what should be consistent

  • what should remain flexible

  • where judgement adds value

  • where consistency does

Done well, systems don’t reduce quality — they protect it.

A Useful Test for Business Owners

Ask yourself:

“Where is highly paid time being spent on work the customer does not value?”

That’s your starting point.

Not for more effort — but for better design.

Closing

Systemising a business isn’t about removing people or personality.
It’s about freeing capacity so the right work gets the attention it deserves.

The most effective systems are rarely the most complex — they are the most deliberate.

Previous
Previous

Why Good Businesses Are Built on Good Stakeholders

Next
Next

What the All Blacks Can Teach Business Owners About Succession